Skip to main content

New 'Mothman' Sighting in Point Pleasant

Annotated by; Madison Brock

As the research for this mysterious creature continued, I stumbled across an article on cryptozoologynews.com. I was intrigued by the URL as I flew to a quick conclusion that this article would be a credible source. But as I analyzed it, I did a complete 180-degree turn. Although this website is based on the news of cryptozoology, the study of unknown animals, and could be deemed as credible source due to being a place strictly for that, this article is not credible due to the lack of reliable information and its short length. 
This article could be argued to be credible due to the website’s overall content and purpose as well as its layout. The overall purpose of the website is to discuss all sorts of creatures that could be considered in the cryptozoology category such as UFOs, pterodactyls, bigfoot and more. Mothman can most definitely be associated with unknown things such as those. The layout of the website had tabs at the top which gives the audience the option to contact the website or even report a sighting yourself. On the right side of the website, their social media handles for Twitter and their FaceBook page is provided which is a nice touch for the reader to further see what their website is about, helping the site’s credibility as it isn’t just a fanbased website. 
This article could also be deemed not credible because it has a lack of reliable information. The article was extremely vauge and didn’t give much content to the audience about mothman. The 16-year-old minor was the eyewitness and age could be a problem due to still being in a child-like state of mind. The winner here to the article not being credible is the fact that the report stated that there were no evidence or pictures. If there weren’t any evidence, how can one be certain it really happened, and it wasn’t all made up? That can make the audience question the credibility of the article in an instance.  
Also, the article provided a quick recap to what claimed to be a mothman sighting back in 2010. A 16-year-old minor from Tennessee was visiting his friend in, you guessed it: Point Pleasant, West Virginia, known for the reported mothman sighting back in the 60s. The minor claimed, “We both saw a black figure outside the house, standing in the road. I thought it was a giant owl of some sort.” He continues by describing the creature: 7 feet tall, black, owl-like face with red glowing eyes. As the article was straight to the point, the vague content given can make the source not be credible as it barely gives details about the situation. This article only included 10 sentences about this reported sighting, a short simple-and-sweet article that’s easy on the eyes but too easy to be credible. 
In conclusion, the article could be deemed credible or not credible, but from my analysis I have drawn the conclusion it is not credible based on the lack of reliable evidence provided and how short the article actually is. 
Work Cited 
“New ‘Mothman’ Sighting in Point Pleasant.” http://cryptozoologynews.com/new-mothman-sighting-point-pleasant/28 Oct 2018 
Picture Found at; https://www.redbubble.com/people/emstylauzer/works/28994165-mothman-chibi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mothman: Monster, Disaster, and Community

Annotated by; Garret Greenlee         This article talks is a general summary of Mothman and a few encounters with it. The article discusses an encounter with Mothman where individuals saw a “pair of enormous glowing red eyes”. The witness went on to describe the eyes as “hypnotic” and said that this creature was around 7 and a half feet tall and had wings. The witnesses within the car said that this creature followed them as they were in a very wooded area of West Virginia to the closest town and approached speeds of 100 miles per hour. The people that saw this creature went immediately to the county courthouse and told a deputy, who then went back with them to where they saw this creature.  Of course when the deputy went back with them to where the witnesses saw this creature, there was no sign of him. However, the next morning the local county sheriff called for a press conference where the witnesses were interviewed and the creature soon after became the “Mothman”. After

The Mothman Prophecies

Annotated by; Madison Brock While doing research on the  Mothman , an article titled “The Real Story of the  Mothman  Prophecies,” posted on  ign.com , provided insight of the backstory context of this myth. The article is written by Scott  B ,  who introduces the topic by explaining the movie, “The  Mothman  Prophecies.”   It states how there is always the warning of “based on true events.” The article explains what exactly those true events are. Although the website may seem untrusting as the construction of it is based around video games and movies, it can be considered credible due to the reliable sources and statistics provided in the article. Mothman is a creature that has the body shape of a human yet also has huge wings and heating eyes, something that has never been seen before. This article is told through an interview with Loren Coleman, a cryptozoologist: one who studies unknown animals. Coleman explains the happenings of the first main sighting of the  Mothman

“Mothman spotted: Three separate eye witness accounts of strange creature in Chicago”

Annotated by; Kameron Bonner   Article Written by; Danny Beauregard   This article describes three different eye witness reports that have recently surfaced in the city of Chicago. Eye witness reports typically don’t have much concrete evidence as to what they are trying to prove unless from a very reliable source. The author of this article, Danny Beauregard, states that most  Mothman  sightings don’t amount to much, however he says, “This is different.” I fail to see where these reports are any different than every other report I have already read. Nothing truly sets them apart, and the witnesses don’t provide any concrete evidence as to the  Mothman ’ s  existence.    Within the article, there are numerous grammatical errors, which could be chopped up to poor editorial skills. This makes you question the credibility of the author and the article itself. The first eye witness report described a “bat like creature,” followed by an “overwhelming sensation of dread.” T